[GHC] #8173: GHC uses nub
Muhaimin Ahsan
leroux at fezrev.com
Fri Sep 27 21:39:12 UTC 2013
Kim-Ee,
The updated fib-analyse report from a few hours ago is posted here: https://gist.github.com/leroux/6725810#file-headvordnub-analysis-L2988
Comment (http://ghc.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/8173#comment:9)
Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Muhaimin
On Sep 27, 2013, at 3:56 PM, Kim-Ee Yeoh <ky3 at atamo.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 8:14 PM, GHC <ghc-devs at haskell.org> wrote:
> A 5% improvement in compile time is remarkable, if it's true. Great! But
> I'm always worried about the noise in compile times measured in seconds.
>
> Does anyone else think the noise in runtimes is alarming considering that the following is the fib-analysis of /binary-identical/ programs?
>
> > Min -0.1% -0.0% -25.4% -32.2% -1.3%
> > Max +0.1% +0.0% +19.0% +22.2% +10.0%
>
> Shouldn't we find an explanation for this before believing the compile time numbers? What would cause these wide swings on the benchmarking machine?
>
> p.s. For the record: Should do more rigorous statistical testing instead of naive percentages, yes?
>
> -- Kim-Ee
> _______________________________________________
> ghc-tickets mailing list
> ghc-tickets at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/ghc-tickets
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130927/005f230d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130927/005f230d/attachment.pgp>
More information about the ghc-devs
mailing list