darcs support in sync-all

[Ian Lynagh]

On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 05:48:12PM +0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:
> 
> Geoff thinks that the sync-all script has code for deciding whether to add the ".git" or not, but the code was omitted when adding the sub-module stuff.
> 
> Result: in subsequent stuff, git looks in a darcs repo, with consequent terribly confusing results.

Is anyone still using the darcs support in sync-all?

i.e. does anyone object to me removing it?


Thanks
Ian