How accessible is a dynamically-linked ghc?
nicolas.frisby at gmail.com
Thu Jul 11 18:02:08 CEST 2013
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Joachim Breitner
<mail at joachim-breitner.de>wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.07.2013, 14:42 -0500 schrieb Nicolas Frisby:
> > 2) Are the major GHC distributors planning on distributing
> > dynamically-linked ghc by default? GHC HQ, Haskell Platform,
> > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/distribution_packages?
> You are talking about the GHC binary itself, not about how GHC compiles
> the libraries and programs, right? For the latter case, answers for
> Debian (and Ubuntu) can be found in
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-November/023093.htmland I’m happy to elaborate. In the former case: *shrug* – should we?
Yes, I was talking about the GHC binary itself. Even so, that is a very
rich thread; thanks for the pointer.
I was asking for various reasons. I'm not casting a vote either way.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ghc-devs