How accessible is a dynamically-linked ghc?

[Nicolas Frisby]

On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Joachim Breitner
<mail at joachim-breitner.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Am Mittwoch, den 10.07.2013, 14:42 -0500 schrieb Nicolas Frisby:
> >   2) Are the major GHC distributors planning on distributing
> > dynamically-linked ghc by default? GHC HQ, Haskell Platform,
> > http://www.haskell.org/ghc/distribution_packages?
>
>
> You are talking about the GHC binary itself, not about how GHC compiles
> the libraries and programs, right? For the latter case, answers for
> Debian (and Ubuntu) can be found in
>
> http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-November/023093.htmland I’m happy to elaborate. In the former case: *shrug* – should we?
>

Yes, I was talking about the GHC binary itself. Even so, that is a very
rich thread; thanks for the pointer.

I was asking for various reasons. I'm not casting a vote either way.

Thanks.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130711/ada17f90/attachment.htm>