How accessible is a dynamically-linked ghc?

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Mittwoch, den 10.07.2013, 14:42 -0500 schrieb Nicolas Frisby:
>   2) Are the major GHC distributors planning on distributing
> dynamically-linked ghc by default? GHC HQ, Haskell Platform,
> http://www.haskell.org/ghc/distribution_packages?


You are talking about the GHC binary itself, not about how GHC compiles
the libraries and programs, right? For the latter case, answers for
Debian (and Ubuntu) can be found in
http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/glasgow-haskell-users/2012-November/023093.html and I’m happy to elaborate. In the former case: *shrug* – should we?

Greetings,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  Jabber: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de  • GPG-Key: 0x4743206C
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/ghc-devs/attachments/20130711/417768bf/attachment.pgp>