haddock-2.3.0 literate comments discarded from .lhs input
sanzhiyan at gmail.com
Thu Feb 19 10:53:43 EST 2009
Sorry for the delay, the patch "rewrite of
Distribution.Simple.Haddock" includes these changes among the others.
I'm not really satisfied by the readability of some parts of the code,
though, but it should be a consistent improvement anyhow.
It probably won't merge in the 1.6 branch as-is because of changes in
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Duncan Coutts
<duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 13:19 +0000, Alistair Bayley wrote:
>> 2009/2/12 Alistair Bayley <alistair at abayley.org>:
>> > 2009/2/8 Andrea Vezzosi <sanzhiyan at gmail.com>:
>> >> I did work on this and i simplified the code a lot fixing
>> >> inconsistencies and making more explicit what how each component
>> >> contributes to the arguments to haddock.
>> > Is this in HEAD? If so then I have some changes. Attached is a patch.
>> No comments.
> Ah, I was hoping you and Saizan could work this out together.
>> Is this patch OK? Are you likely to apply/fix this for the next Cabal
>> release? Would you like me to do some more work on it? etc etc
> It will not be in 126.96.36.199 because that is very nearly released already.
> I'm hoping we that it can go into the HEAD version but I'd like some
> comment from Saizan on if this would get in the way of his changes or if
> perhaps he's already integrated this in his changes.
More information about the cabal-devel