haddock-2.3.0 literate comments discarded from .lhs input

Duncan Coutts duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Thu Feb 19 09:12:21 EST 2009

On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 13:19 +0000, Alistair Bayley wrote:
> 2009/2/12 Alistair Bayley <alistair at abayley.org>:
> > 2009/2/8 Andrea Vezzosi <sanzhiyan at gmail.com>:
> >> I did work on this and i simplified the code a lot fixing
> >> inconsistencies and making more explicit what how each component
> >> contributes to the arguments to haddock.
> >
> > Is this in HEAD? If so then I have some changes. Attached is a patch.
> No comments.

Ah, I was hoping you and Saizan could work this out together.

> Is this patch OK? Are you likely to apply/fix this for the next Cabal
> release? Would you like me to do some more work on it? etc etc

It will not be in because that is very nearly released already.

I'm hoping we that it can go into the HEAD version but I'd like some
comment from Saizan on if this would get in the way of his changes or if
perhaps he's already integrated this in his changes.


More information about the cabal-devel mailing list