[arch-haskell] Snap web framework - not in ArchHaskell?
Dawid Loubser
dawid.loubser
Wed Oct 9 09:54:33 UTC 2013
Thank you kindly, Ramana.
I have to put quite a lot of work (learning) into Haskell before I would
be of any real use, I was simply interested in playing around with snap
as one of the avenues of learning. I quite like the philosophy of snap.
I'll certainly be in contact once I can meaningfully contribute (or
meaningfully ask questions!).
D.
Op Wo, 2013-10-09 om 10:33 +0100 skryf Ramana Kumar:
> I should also mention explicitly that we'd be very happy to help on
> this mailing list and/or on the IRC channel.
>
> Ask whatever questions you like, and eventually the results of this
> discussion can be put on the wiki to make it easier to package things
> up in the future.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Ramana Kumar <ramana at member.fsf.org>
> wrote:
> Getting packages into arch-haskell just requires someone to
> put in the time and maintenance effort.
>
> There's a section at
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Haskell_package_guidelines on improving Arch Haskell.
> If you get familiar with cblrepo and start a haskell-snap
> repository, that would be the first step towards getting Snap
> into arch-haskell.
>
> You might want to build on Nicola's haskell-happstack
> repository (in case many of the dependencies are shared), or
> at least use it for inspiration.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Dawid Loubser
> <dawid.loubser at ibi.co.za> wrote:
> Thanks for tha, B?r?ur!
>
> It's a bit of a pity that I would have to duplicate
> many libraries
> aready installed via arch-haskell / pacman with cabal
> natively (and I
> agree, needs to be fully-isolated - I'll look into
> hsenv, thanks!).
>
> I'm curious - I thought the goal of arch-haskell was
> to ultimately
> contain all hackage packages. Snap is in hackage -
> what makes it
> difficult to get into arch-haskell?
>
> I am not trying to complain - just trying to establish
> the situation. I
> am very new to the haskell world, but passionate about
> it beyond belief.
> I am happy to help where I can.
>
> kind regards,
> Dawid Loubser
>
>
> Op Di, 2013-10-08 om 19:43 +0200 skryf Bardur
> Arantsson:
> > On 2013-10-08 11:54, Dawid Loubser wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I noticed that neither the snap, nor the yesod web
> frameworks are in the
> > > arch-haskell repo - is there a specific reason for
> this?
> > >
> > > What would you recommend is the best way to
> install and use snap?
> > > (since it has been made clear that cabal is not a
> package manager, yet
> > > snap recommends installing it via cabal... :-S )
> > >
> >
> > Well, it's not *really* a package manager, but it
> seems to be growing in
> > that direction... :)
> >
> > Anyway, any users of Snap are probably going to be
> developers, and I
> > think it's pretty par for the course for developers
> to install libraries
> > they're using from Hackage.
> >
> > I would recommend using "hsenv" for keeping
> per-project Cabal
> > environments. (The new Cabal will have support for
> similar isolation,
> > but I don't think it's really been released yet.)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > B?r?ur
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch-haskell mailing list
> > arch-haskell at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch-haskell mailing list
> arch-haskell at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20131009/2295c90f/attachment.sig>
More information about the arch-haskell
mailing list