[arch-haskell] Snap web framework - not in ArchHaskell?

Dawid Loubser dawid.loubser
Wed Oct 9 09:54:33 UTC 2013


Thank you kindly, Ramana.

I have to put quite a lot of work (learning) into Haskell before I would
be of any real use, I was simply interested in playing around with snap
as one of the avenues of learning. I quite like the philosophy of snap.

I'll certainly be in contact once I can meaningfully contribute (or
meaningfully ask questions!).

D.

Op Wo, 2013-10-09 om 10:33 +0100 skryf Ramana Kumar:
> I should also mention explicitly that we'd be very happy to help on
> this mailing list and/or on the IRC channel.
> 
> Ask whatever questions you like, and eventually the results of this
> discussion can be put on the wiki to make it easier to package things
> up in the future.
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Ramana Kumar <ramana at member.fsf.org>
> wrote:
>         Getting packages into arch-haskell just requires someone to
>         put in the time and maintenance effort.
>         
>         There's a section at
>         https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Haskell_package_guidelines on improving Arch Haskell.
>         If you get familiar with cblrepo and start a haskell-snap
>         repository, that would be the first step towards getting Snap
>         into arch-haskell.
>         
>         You might want to build on Nicola's haskell-happstack
>         repository (in case many of the dependencies are shared), or
>         at least use it for inspiration.
>         
>         
>         
>         On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Dawid Loubser
>         <dawid.loubser at ibi.co.za> wrote:
>                 Thanks for tha, B?r?ur!
>                 
>                 It's a bit of a pity that I would have to duplicate
>                 many libraries
>                 aready installed via arch-haskell / pacman with cabal
>                 natively (and I
>                 agree, needs to be fully-isolated - I'll look into
>                 hsenv, thanks!).
>                 
>                 I'm curious - I thought the goal of arch-haskell was
>                 to ultimately
>                 contain all hackage packages. Snap is in hackage -
>                 what makes it
>                 difficult to get into arch-haskell?
>                 
>                 I am not trying to complain - just trying to establish
>                 the situation. I
>                 am very new to the haskell world, but passionate about
>                 it beyond belief.
>                 I am happy to help where I can.
>                 
>                 kind regards,
>                 Dawid Loubser
>                 
>                 
>                 Op Di, 2013-10-08 om 19:43 +0200 skryf Bardur
>                 Arantsson:
>                 > On 2013-10-08 11:54, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>                 > > Hi all,
>                 > >
>                 > > I noticed that neither the snap, nor the yesod web
>                 frameworks are in the
>                 > > arch-haskell repo - is there a specific reason for
>                 this?
>                 > >
>                 > > What would you recommend is the best way to
>                 install and use snap?
>                 > > (since it has been made clear that cabal is not a
>                 package manager, yet
>                 > > snap recommends installing it via cabal... :-S )
>                 > >
>                 >
>                 > Well, it's not *really* a package manager, but it
>                 seems to be growing in
>                 > that direction... :)
>                 >
>                 > Anyway, any users of Snap are probably going to be
>                 developers, and I
>                 > think it's pretty par for the course for developers
>                 to install libraries
>                 > they're using from Hackage.
>                 >
>                 > I would recommend using "hsenv" for keeping
>                 per-project Cabal
>                 > environments. (The new Cabal will have support for
>                 similar isolation,
>                 > but I don't think it's really been released yet.)
>                 >
>                 > Regards,
>                 >
>                 > B?r?ur
>                 >
>                 > _______________________________________________
>                 > arch-haskell mailing list
>                 > arch-haskell at haskell.org
>                 > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
>                 
>                 
>                 _______________________________________________
>                 arch-haskell mailing list
>                 arch-haskell at haskell.org
>                 http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
>                 
>         
>         
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 230 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/arch-haskell/attachments/20131009/2295c90f/attachment.sig>



More information about the arch-haskell mailing list