[arch-haskell] Current procedure to install Hakyll (with deps)
magnus at therning.org
Sat Oct 12 07:40:16 UTC 2013
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:54 AM, <gdweber at iue.edu> wrote:
> On 2012-Jun-12, Mateusz Loskot wrote:
>> On 12 June 2012 11:53, Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz at loskot.net> wrote:
>> > [...]
>> >> So, here comes my question:
>> >> Considering I'm interested in Hakyll, could anyone recommend where
>> >> should I grab all the related packages and required dependencies from?
>> > Don't use AUR!
>> OK, I won't.
>> > Check to see how many of the dependencies are in [haskell], if all are
>> > there: profit!
>> I will try this option tonight.
>> > If only a few are missing you can always raise a bug to
>> > get them added (I look favourable upon existence of patches +
>> > pre-built packages).
>> I'm usually happy to contribute too, though in case of Haskell I'm
>> green as Irish grass.
> I, too find, the Hakyll package interesting.
> I am interested in contributing a hakyll packages and its missing
> dependencies, provided I can get some feedback on my previous
> attempted contribution (of OpenGL).
> A few questions and comments:
> 1. Installing the latest version of Hakyll, 184.108.40.206,
> would require upgrading blaze-html
> and reinstalling (probably breaking, warns cabal install --dry-run)
> pandoc. It seems best to aim at hakyll 220.127.116.11, which is
> the latest version that can use blaze-html 0.4.* (we are at 0.4.3.3-5).
The latest version of blaze-html either requires a few other updates,
or breaks other packages at the moment. I can't remember which it is,
but you can easily see check by attempting to add it using `cblrepo`.
Settling for an older version of hakyll is all right for the moment.
> 2. Hakyll has a "previewServer" flag, which, if True (the default),
> also depends on snap-core and snap-server. Making a hakyll package
> with the previewServer would require 21 new packages, including hakyll
> itself. Without the previewServer, it would require only 5 new packages.
> So I think I would plan *at first* to provide the package *without* the
> 3. Assuming cblrepo does not automatically set the previewServer
> flag to False, I think the best way to do this would be a patch
> for the PKGBUILD?
Either a patch to the PKGBUILD or a patch to the .cabal.
If you come up with a good way to pass in flags when running `cblrepo
add` then please let me know :)
> 4. One of the dependencies is hamlet, which requires another flag
> setting, blaze_html_0_5 to be False, in order to use blaze-html < 0.5.
> Again, a PKGBUILD patch?
Or .cabal patch.
Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4
email: magnus at therning.org jabber: magnus at therning.org
twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus
More information about the arch-haskell