[xmonad] RFC: XMonad.Prompt.ConfirmPrompt module

Carsten Mattner carstenmattner at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 21:13:07 UTC 2015


On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:09 PM, Michael Sloan <mgsloan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Certainly!  It didn't cause me issues 7 or 8 years ago when I wrote
> those modules in the first place.  Point is, I haven't used darcs in
> that time, and so how to use it has faded.  I could create a git
> branch and submit a pull request in under a minute.
>
> Let me re-iterate that this is due to supreme laziness, primarily due
> to these cleanups being unimportant.  It's more of a vanity thing, as
> I wrote the code back when I was still new to Haskell.

I'm all in favor of facilitating more contributions and don't mind
a git migration for that.

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 1:33 PM, Peter Jones <mlists at pmade.com> wrote:
>> Michael Sloan <mgsloan at gmail.com> writes:
>>> I think we could see a revitalization of XMonad if such barriers to
>>> contribution are lowered.  I would certainly be more likely to
>>> contribute patches.
>>
>> I just submitted my first patch and I can say that Darcs didn't cause me
>> any issues.
>>
>> There's been a lot of talk about code review system but what are we
>> using right now for XMonad?  I can say that I certainly don't like the
>> idea of submitting patches to a mailing list.  I have no idea if the
>> patches I've submitted have been seen or will fall off the fold as new
>> messages come in.
>>
>> --
>> Peter Jones, Founder, Devalot.com
>> Defending the honor of good code
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> xmonad mailing list
>> xmonad at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad
> _______________________________________________
> xmonad mailing list
> xmonad at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xmonad


More information about the xmonad mailing list