[xmonad] register XMonad as window manager with X

[Jochen Keil]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08.11.2011 09:48, Ivan Lazar Miljenovic wrote:
> On 8 November 2011 19:36, Jochen Keil <jochen.keil at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> I agree with your point about making a release without changes. 
>> However, there were enough changes, patches and bugfixes in the
>> last two years to justify a release. This is also some kind of a 
>> chicken-egg problem:
> 
> Oh, it's definitely worth having one _now_.
Sure, but why isn't it happening? :)
What's keeping everyone from releasing the long debated (there were some
mails a few weeks ago..) 1.0 version? I mean it can't be too hard to tag
1.0 in darcs and build a tarball.
I'd do it myself if
a) I'd be a bit more involved in xmonad development and
b) this wouldn't feel like just pushing my name to the front now.

>> Personally I'd also vote for release versions like 2011Q1 or
>> 20110301 or something similar (just propagate if it's yyyymmdd or
>> yyyyddmm ;). In case of urgent bugfixes you could still do
>> something like 2011Q1.01 or 20110301.01 etc.
> 
> Except we can't use these types of version "numbers" for Hackage,
> and they don't match the Package Versioning Policy: 
> http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy
Too bad that there's a policy. Although I personally don't like
versioning using major and minor numbers, I understand that it's
necessary for something like the haskell platform.
Thanks for pointing me to it.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk65hzcACgkQtVwvsA+W4CClYwCfTw3+iq/I5MsZ1j+Zpa9d3icI
39YAnAsL2edv1TO4zE9qGkVy8dg/CD64
=L2jE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----