[xmonad] xmonad development (was: something in particular)
rdiaz02 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 8 15:27:50 CET 2011
On Mon, 07 Nov 2011 12:59:59 -0500,"Allen S. Rout" <asr at ufl.edu> wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 12:13 PM, Norbert Zeh wrote:
> > Let me address the two separate points here:
> > (1) No official release in 2 years: This makes me a bit uneasy about the future
> > of xmonad, as it seems the original authors have lost interest in the project.
> "Me, too". But it seems that the torch has been passed, not dropped.
> Truly, the state that no current coders have commit is a little skeery.
> > Bottom line: I highly recommend running the darcs
> > version, particularly given the current state of affairs regarding point (1).
> Understood, and I'm willing to go do that.
> But I think it's reasonable to point out that, in effect, xmonad
> positively repels new converts. As in, aggressively discourages them.
> Here's the path I've trod so far:
> - install vendor packages. Understand that I'll need to dog-paddle in
> haskell to function in xmonad. Tinker. Get frustrated
> - go learn about cabal, because bluetile suggests that it's a better way
> to get up-to-date code. On the way to bluetile, get enough xmonad
> functioning to not need it. Think "Ah, OK. vendor packages out of
> date, use the CPAN-equivalent for haskell, and all will be good".
> - Find that the haskell platform hasn't been updated in 7 months,
> despite the claim it'd get love in July. Get nervous about the entire
> haskell community.
> - See that cabal xmonad is -2 years!- out of date. Shudder. Understand
> that I need to learn darcs.
> So, in order to use your WM, I have to completely bathe in haskell, down
> to learning the ideosyncratic, haskell-only VC you guys have cooked up.
> I _really like_ xmonad. I think it's a delightfully featureful and
> spare WM universe, and I'm feeling in better control of my desktop than
> I've been since I ditched CTWM.
> But insisting that new users be baptized into your church (or at least
> attend sunday school for a few months) is really bad for adoption.
I want to (partially) second the comments by Allen Rout.
I started using Xmonad about 3 years ago, using the stock Debian package
(by then, version 0.8.? ?). I do program, but not in Haskell, and I had
tried other tiling wm before, including awesome, dwm, wmii, and
ion3. Nevertheless, I was able to get xmonad to do (exactly?) what I wanted,
given the amount of excellent documentation and tutorials. However, this
took some time. Nevertheless, the end was really worth it. xmonad is the
only WM I've used in the last 3 years, and is one of the first things I
get going in any new machine.
But now, when I read that 0.9 is obsolete (my current version, running
Debian, is 0.9.2-2) and that I should grab the one in darcs, etc, etc, and
possibly start fiddling around... well, I really don't feel tempted at all
to try that right now (and I will, at least for now, feel solace in the
"if it ain't broken, don't fix it").
> xmonad mailing list
> xmonad at haskell.org
Department of Biochemistry, Lab B-25.
Facultad de Medicina (UAM)
Arzobispo Morcillo, 2
Email: rdiaz02 at gmail.com
ramon.diaz at iib.uam.es
More information about the xmonad