[xmonad] Opinions (skip if you are busy)
gwern0 at gmail.com
Wed Apr 8 23:03:06 EDT 2009
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Adam Vogt <vogt.adam at gmail.com> wrote:
> The XMonad.Config namespace seems like it could use some love: it has some
> redundancy (Xfce, Kde, Desktop), and it could probably showcase more
> elabourate configs.
> Another thing that I've found is that the sample configs on the wiki are
> based on the template: personally they are (in general) a bit verbose.
> Would it be a good thing to show just the minimum necessary, or is it
> helpful that the configs are explicit?
I don't entirely follow this. Configs haven't been based on the template since 0.5; are you looking at the ones in the old section?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 270 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/xmonad/attachments/20090408/2c493e09/signature.bin
More information about the xmonad