[xmonad] Re: A New Solution to Removing the GHC Dependency

brian brianchina60221 at gmail.com
Tue Jul 22 07:49:54 EDT 2008

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Miernik <public at public.miernik.name> wrote:
> This is perfectly true. Someone here said that "124 MB is not a lot, are
> you sure its a problem?". Well, it bloody is, its just killing the idea
> of using a light window manager. If I wanted to scuk 124 MB just to
> manage my windows, I would install Gnome or KDE. I am in the market for
> lightweight tiling window managers, because I like to keep my software
> light.

XMonad is light in terms of lines of source and errors per line. If
you're in some kind of disk space crisis that nobody else in the world
knows anything about, you can definitely get some WM that takes fewer
bytes on disk. But maybe just think for a minute about whether that
would make any sense.

More information about the xmonad mailing list