[xmonad] The future of Decoartion

David Roundy droundy at darcs.net
Thu Feb 7 15:56:30 EST 2008


On Thu, Feb 07, 2008 at 07:47:19PM +0100, Andrea Rossato wrote:
> ps: I know it's hard to believe, but I misunderstood both the meaning
> of "stacked" and of "tabbed", in your comment, David. Moreover,
> Spencer (I think) suggested something like this - and I agreed that
> could solve the problem - , but I replied it was not possible, or just
> too complex, because it didn't occur to me that in order to find out
> if two windows are perfectly ... stacked, you just have to check if
> the share the same ... rectangle, whereas I thought you should... wait
> and look at the monitor!

Ah, that makes sense.  I'm glad this is cleared up! Misunderstandings over
language is very easy to make... one of the advantages of being able to
talk in Haskell... but even that's hard to understand when you encounter
unfamiliar idioms or functions! (see below)

> (Then add that I think this is the first time I'm watching an
> accumulating list like that - which is quite a cool thing I've never
> thought about!)

Thanks!
-- 
David Roundy
Department of Physics
Oregon State University


More information about the xmonad mailing list