[xmonad] darcs patch: Add windowRemover for make tabbed return just the focu...

Spencer Janssen sjanssen at cse.unl.edu
Sun Feb 3 23:55:25 EST 2008


On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 08:25:55PM -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> Hi Andrea (and others)
> 
> I have only partly been following this discussion, but followed enough
> to have a pretty clear idea what was going on when I upgraded my
> xmonad today.  As expected, tabbed stopped working, so I set out to
> fix it, and I hope I didn't step on anyone's toes.  I'd vaguely been
> thinking about this, and I've now pushed my changes.  Perhaps this was
> a little over-impulsive, but I hoped that by simple presenting a
> solution, we'd get over the apparent impasse this discussion has come
> to.
> 
> Spencer is right that returning all the windows in a tabbed layout
> causes trouble, in particular my WindowNavigation setup with tabbed
> and combineTwo breaks.  But I really like your approach of separating
> the decorator from the actual layout, it's very clean.  I took the
> liberty of making Decoration remove the duplicate windows as it adds
> the decorations.  This seems to me like the "right" approach (or
> perhaps I should say *a* right approach), as it only removes windows
> that have precisely the same rectangle, and it's not clear to me that
> you ever really want to actually make visible two windows that
> entirely overlap.  This is also nice, in that at this stage there's no
> trouble telling which are decorations and which are "real" windows.
> 
> I also added support for mouse clicking into Decoration, so that
> (modulo the need to avoid the broadcastMessage patch that breaks mouse
> support for tabbed anyhow) we now have fully functional tabs.
> 
> Andrea, these changes you've made are really cool, and I do hope that
> you'll stick with it.  It'd be a real shame to have you leave the
> project!
> 
> David
> 
> P.S. I've probably apologized enough already, but in case it isn't
> clear, you can feel free to rewrite or reverse these changes
> (preferably without breaking anything, of course).

Ah, now this is a clever idea I hadn't considered.  It still seems a little bit
messy, but I think it will work just fine.  In the long term, if we ever decide
to generalize decorations, we can look at alternatives.


Cheers,
Spencer Janssen


More information about the xmonad mailing list