michael at snoyman.com
Mon Aug 6 10:00:55 CEST 2012
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Kazu Yamamoto <kazu at iij.ad.jp> wrote:
> I would like to ask someone to test fast-logger on Windows before I
> will release new version:
> In the hackathon in the ICFP week last year, I implemented the
> unix-time package which makes use of C libraries. Today, I compared
> three packages: http-date, unix-time, and time:
> The result is as follows:
> http-date: 359ns
> unix-time: 2,071ns
> time: 43,636ns
> http-date can produce RFC 2616 date style (GMT) only. unix-time can
> produce zoned date.
> fast-logger used the time library to format zoned date. Since
> unix-time is much faster than time, I modified fast-logger to use
> unix-time on Unix. On Windows, it still uses the time library.
> I have tested the new fast-logger on Unix. If someone will kindly test
> it on Windows, it would be appreciated.
> Thanks in advance.
> web-devel mailing list
> web-devel at haskell.org
I just compiled the code on Windows without a hitch. As usual, thanks for
making all of our code run even faster than it used to :).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the web-devel