[web-devel] Setting variables in hamlet forall

[Mark Bradley]

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Max Cantor <mxcantor at gmail.com> wrote:
> put me in the opposed category.
>
> You can just as easily put:
>  let formId rs = fromMaybe "" $ lookup $...
>
> in the haskell function that loads the hamlet file then you just have to put
>  #{formId rs}
>
> in the hamlet.  I think adding syntax should be done only when very necessary.  seems like a very small win here at a big cost.

Where is the cost? Most of the effort would be just glueing together
some pieces of existing code. Given that there are already two places
where hamlet does variable binding, adding a third will not hurt it,
or perhaps a single more expressive form of variable binding is
required. Something like monadic bind (>>=) where you can bind
non-monadic values using the identity monad.

>
> yes, if you have a situation where many handlers are calling the same hamlet file, there might be some duplication, but then you can always raise the formId function to a top-level function.
>
> max
>
>  On Apr 7, 2011, at 5:15 PM, Michael Snoyman wrote:
>
>> I've been very hesitant about adding more features to Hamlet, especially ones that are already implemented in Haskell. That's been my reasoning for avoiding any kind of variable definitions until now. However, this does seem like a compelling use case.
>>
>> I don't think it would make sense to limit it to foralls: it makes as much sense in maybes, and I think it would be confusing if it only applied in some cases. As for syntax, how about:
>>
>> $forall row <- rs
>>     $let formId = fromMaybe "" $ IntMap.lookup $ getInt "form_id" row
>>     ...
>>
>> I'm not 100% sold on this yet, what does everyone else think?
>>
>> One last note: I'm probably going to be announcing a feature freeze on Yesod 0.8 *very* soon, and making a beta release to Yackage so that people can test. If you have any last-minute input, now's the time. I'm planning on giving the beta test period about a week, and then releasing to Hackage.
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 2:57 AM, <vagif.verdi at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I noticed a pattern that in hamlet $forall i often retrieve the same value
>> from a map, Sometimes 3,4 times.
>>
>>    $forall row <- rs
>>            <td><a href=@{FormR (getInt "form_id" row)}>#{getStr "form_name"
>> row}
>>            <td>#{getStr "docname" row}
>>            ...
>>            <td>#{fromMaybe "" (IntMap.lookup (getInt "form_id" row)
>> counties)}
>>            <td>#{fromMaybe "" (IntMap.lookup (getInt "form_id" row)
>> customers)}
>>
>> Would it be possible to allow let statement in forall for often used values ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Vagif Verdi
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> web-devel mailing list
>> web-devel at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> web-devel mailing list
>> web-devel at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> web-devel mailing list
> web-devel at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/web-devel
>



-- 
-barkmadley
sent from an internet enabled device