Proposal: add `on` to the Prelude

[Oliver Charles]

I would ignore that comment actually, it's not well thought out.

(I was roughly meaning that I don't want to write `import Prelude (x1,
x2, ..., x500)`, but this isn't a valid argument as I don't actually
explicitly import `Prelude` anyway).

That said, I would still prefer as many symbols as possible to have
explicit binding sites, which means I would prefer to be explicit
about my import to `on` rather than assume it from the Prelude.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 3:49 PM Helmut Schmidt
<helmut.schmidt.4711 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> What do you mean by "I'd also rather that not be a huge single line from one module"? Can you elaborate how this relates to the proposal?
>
> Am Mi., 11. Sept. 2019 um 14:45 Uhr schrieb Oliver Charles <ollie at ocharles.org.uk>:
>>
>> I would prefer *everything* to have an explicit import "binding site",
>> and I'd also rather that not be a huge single line from one module
>> (though of course, I can break the import up other multiple lines).