qualified exports , what would that mean Re: Add

[Lennart Augustsson]

I don’t really see how it subverts anything.  If you rename the module on
import, then that’s the module name you have to use when accessing a
qualified export.

On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 23:28 Henning Thielemann <
lemming at henning-thielemann.de> wrote:

>
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2019, Lennart Augustsson wrote:
>
> > Qualified exports seem very unproblematic to me.  And they should be
> > easy to implement. It’s just an extra flag on each exported entity that
> > tells compiler if the unqualified name should be entered into the symbol
> > table or not.
>
> But it subverts the idea of disambiguation by renaming the module name at
> the import site.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20190221/6d898e00/attachment.html>