Proposal: flipped fmap in base (again)

Elliot Cameron eacameron at
Thu Feb 23 04:57:02 UTC 2017

Heh, I suppose that doesn't help my case much, does it? I "derived" the
name for my own uses many times prior to seeing it elsewhere (most notably
Like I said, the name "ffor" isn't wildly important IMO. I don't want to
start the "fmap should be map" debate all over again either.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:51 PM, John Wiegley <johnw at>

> >>>>> "EC" == Elliot Cameron <eacameron at> writes:
> EC> FWIW, I'm less concerned about the precise name of ffor, although it
> seems
> EC> sad to to lose the obvious correlation with fmap.
> Ah, it wasn't until you said that that I understood why "ffor", but now it
> makes some sense. :)
> --
> John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
>                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the Libraries mailing list