Proposal: flipped fmap in base (again)

[Elliot Cameron]

Heh, I suppose that doesn't help my case much, does it? I "derived" the
name for my own uses many times prior to seeing it elsewhere (most notably
Reflex:
http://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex/docs/Reflex-Class.html#v:ffor).
Like I said, the name "ffor" isn't wildly important IMO. I don't want to
start the "fmap should be map" debate all over again either.

On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:51 PM, John Wiegley <johnw at newartisans.com>
wrote:

> >>>>> "EC" == Elliot Cameron <eacameron at gmail.com> writes:
>
> EC> FWIW, I'm less concerned about the precise name of ffor, although it
> seems
> EC> sad to to lose the obvious correlation with fmap.
>
> Ah, it wasn't until you said that that I understood why "ffor", but now it
> makes some sense. :)
>
> --
> John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
> http://newartisans.com                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20170222/621f7975/attachment-0001.html>