<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small">Heh, I suppose that doesn't help my case much, does it? I "derived" the name for my own uses many times prior to seeing it elsewhere (most notably Reflex: <a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex/docs/Reflex-Class.html#v:ffor">http://hackage.haskell.org/package/reflex/docs/Reflex-Class.html#v:ffor</a>). Like I said, the name "ffor" isn't wildly important IMO. I don't want to start the "fmap should be map" debate all over again either.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:51 PM, John Wiegley <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:johnw@newartisans.com" target="_blank">johnw@newartisans.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">>>>>> "EC" == Elliot Cameron <<a href="mailto:eacameron@gmail.com">eacameron@gmail.com</a>> writes:<br>
<br>
EC> FWIW, I'm less concerned about the precise name of ffor, although it seems<br>
EC> sad to to lose the obvious correlation with fmap.<br>
<br>
Ah, it wasn't until you said that that I understood why "ffor", but now it<br>
makes some sense. :)<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
--<br>
John Wiegley                  GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F<br>
<a href="http://newartisans.com" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://newartisans.com</a>                          60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>