evan at evanrutledgeborden.dreamhosters.com
Fri Jan 22 17:59:38 UTC 2016
+1 For not changing the Ord instance for Bool. It would be disastrous. As
an aside, is the Order instance for Bool in the report?
On Jan 22, 2016 12:24 PM, "Iavor Diatchki" <iavor.diatchki at gmail.com> wrote:
> Please don't change the ordering on Bool---it's been like that forever and
> it might lead to extremely subtle bugs that won't be caught by the compiler.
> I am ambivalent about adding an `implies` function as long as it is not
> automatically in scope. However, can anyone give some examples of using
> this in your code? All the ones I could think of would seem easier to
> follow when written with `if-then-else` or a guard.
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Felipe Lessa <felipe.lessa at gmail.com>
>> +1 for either Data.Bool.implies or Data.Bool.(==>).
>> +1 for right-associativity.
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries