Proposal: Data.Bool.implies

[Iavor Diatchki]

Please don't change the ordering on Bool---it's been like that forever and
it might lead to extremely subtle bugs that won't be caught by the compiler.

I am ambivalent about adding an `implies` function as long as it is not
automatically in scope.  However, can anyone give some examples of using
this in your code?  All the ones I could think of would seem easier to
follow when written with `if-then-else` or a guard.

-Iavor




On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Felipe Lessa <felipe.lessa at gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 for either Data.Bool.implies or Data.Bool.(==>).
>
> +1 for right-associativity.
>
> Cheers,
>
> --
> Felipe.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20160122/d2a3c0b7/attachment.html>