Proposal: Add conspicuously missing Functor instances for tuples

[Edward Kmett]

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Oliver Charles <ollie at ocharles.org.uk>
wrote:

> I'm not sure I even want to propose this, but if you're going to make it
> consistent for all tuples, should you also make Bifunctor consistent for
> all tuples?
>

The Bifunctor instances are already defined out to 7-tuples or so.

-Edward


> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM Alexander Berntsen <alexander at plaimi.net>
> wrote:
>
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA512
>>
>> On 19/01/16 21:54, Alois Cochard wrote:
>> > I'm in favor of this proposal for consistency sake.
>> As am I. Inconsistency seems like laziness at best, and poorly thought
>> through at worst.
>>
>> - --
>> Alexander
>> alexander at plaimi.net
>> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>
>> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWn4IFAAoJENQqWdRUGk8Bbs4P/RVit2hXVpWn6AaK+zgA8KOA
>> pHyzK93KY+ASLbaWEzsMYwtoreYY1/Rd+xby1St35QGiJm6gEr+LME2LWfWITOur
>> GlPrAWUps/TqipA49JioVKMMOwqub6mcVXisLZt8DGe84pZNarzZXUBh5FGblkGm
>> tZg2tsNT9QEUjodAVi0yf1P+wHNaDz9XaX8/upKMYjkW4tZyeldMky+HBvwBJ8XM
>> feQ3tOTK5dgHPM0ssmUIAVIlL1z0VUmJ6skSNBfQotkCnQRE3uHFagXsCPMGe7gV
>> 9jvLJ1ZHLXFWdS3KtT2UMUzmdQPmygwWCc9jOWZsJr4ndoKBKYConmmYs+Vzvy2x
>> xKqDrHVuKOcEgOOkTHSdXnsw6Wdjs0N9Vw5mc+zFeymf9NoWJeqgijKfInS+jR0b
>> yNYYoVILFY22ISua89dRws0+Ky9gCWkKIbu/+uCteFlXoMv3j60LnmUuoZ3kY+bp
>> H5+c4v3sEObjItbYsRLEo6KiACC1I1bhFJm16+XipAgY0N31R4R9Hr6sCo+yWa2l
>> 9bNJn8KJ/p9N2JZMRUzo2KVwet9VpGq9PP90DDuwf+Nz3xYttWGIUFRgec7OzmHo
>> lYfUWqAtbOP0XguprV2fbxb9Ye3JF0RdqlVoRJCtAlppEkqmu0w8NEt3Uye+ZTkq
>> 2FQ1Dqbh8LiC9dZXNuSD
>> =Cep6
>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20160120/531999fd/attachment.html>