Proposal: Add conspicuously missing Functor instances for tuples

[Oliver Charles]

I'm not sure I even want to propose this, but if you're going to make it
consistent for all tuples, should you also make Bifunctor consistent for
all tuples?

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:48 PM Alexander Berntsen <alexander at plaimi.net>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
>
> On 19/01/16 21:54, Alois Cochard wrote:
> > I'm in favor of this proposal for consistency sake.
> As am I. Inconsistency seems like laziness at best, and poorly thought
> through at worst.
>
> - --
> Alexander
> alexander at plaimi.net
> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWn4IFAAoJENQqWdRUGk8Bbs4P/RVit2hXVpWn6AaK+zgA8KOA
> pHyzK93KY+ASLbaWEzsMYwtoreYY1/Rd+xby1St35QGiJm6gEr+LME2LWfWITOur
> GlPrAWUps/TqipA49JioVKMMOwqub6mcVXisLZt8DGe84pZNarzZXUBh5FGblkGm
> tZg2tsNT9QEUjodAVi0yf1P+wHNaDz9XaX8/upKMYjkW4tZyeldMky+HBvwBJ8XM
> feQ3tOTK5dgHPM0ssmUIAVIlL1z0VUmJ6skSNBfQotkCnQRE3uHFagXsCPMGe7gV
> 9jvLJ1ZHLXFWdS3KtT2UMUzmdQPmygwWCc9jOWZsJr4ndoKBKYConmmYs+Vzvy2x
> xKqDrHVuKOcEgOOkTHSdXnsw6Wdjs0N9Vw5mc+zFeymf9NoWJeqgijKfInS+jR0b
> yNYYoVILFY22ISua89dRws0+Ky9gCWkKIbu/+uCteFlXoMv3j60LnmUuoZ3kY+bp
> H5+c4v3sEObjItbYsRLEo6KiACC1I1bhFJm16+XipAgY0N31R4R9Hr6sCo+yWa2l
> 9bNJn8KJ/p9N2JZMRUzo2KVwet9VpGq9PP90DDuwf+Nz3xYttWGIUFRgec7OzmHo
> lYfUWqAtbOP0XguprV2fbxb9Ye3JF0RdqlVoRJCtAlppEkqmu0w8NEt3Uye+ZTkq
> 2FQ1Dqbh8LiC9dZXNuSD
> =Cep6
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20160120/8b188e6c/attachment.html>