Process proposal: Require explicit user-oriented timelines in library proposals

[Ben Gamari]

Joachim Breitner <mail at joachim-breitner.de> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Am Samstag, den 13.02.2016, 15:11 +0100 schrieb Ben Gamari:
>> In the case of the proposals currently on the roadmap [1] it can
>> sometimes be rather tricky to determine exactly where each of these points
>> fall as the proposals tend to discuss implementation and leave the
>> implications on the user implicit.
>
> Did you see the example roadmap I created on
> https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/3-Release-Policy
>
Ahh, indeed I did not. Thanks for the reference. That comes quite close
to my example. Would it be possible to bring the active proposals up to
this standard?

Cheers,

- Ben

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 472 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20160213/2edfbdb5/attachment.sig>