Process proposal: Require explicit user-oriented timelines in library proposals

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Samstag, den 13.02.2016, 15:11 +0100 schrieb Ben Gamari:
> In the case of the proposals currently on the roadmap [1] it can
> sometimes be rather tricky to determine exactly where each of these points
> fall as the proposals tend to discuss implementation and leave the
> implications on the user implicit.

Did you see the example roadmap I created on
https://prime.haskell.org/wiki/Libraries/3-Release-Policy

That goes a bit in your direction.

> How does this sound?

Good!

Gruß,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20160213/66182efb/attachment.sig>