Monad of no `return` Proposal (MRP): Moving `return` out of `Monad`

[John Wiegley]

>>>>> Henrik Nilsson <Henrik.Nilsson at nottingham.ac.uk> writes:

> Again, Graham and I were not saying "don't break things". We were saying "if
> things are to be broken, then there had better be very compelling reasons".

> That's a big difference.

You made a great argument, Henrik, and you've changed my enthusiastic +1 to
+0, until it can be bundled with some other, more necessary, breaking change.

John