traverse_

[Herbert Valerio Riedel]

On 2015-03-31 at 06:27:32 +0200, Chris Wong wrote:

[...]

> While it would be useful to have it in the Prelude, traverse_ doesn't
> fit either of the motivations above. So I think its omission is
> intended here.

That is not to say that it can't be proposed for inclusion... IOW, just
turn the cautious "'traverse_' is not exported from Prelude [..] Is this
intentional?"-question into an explicit/proper library proposal!

Cheers,
  hvr