Proposal: instance MonadIO Q
Edward Kmett
ekmett at gmail.com
Wed Jul 29 16:33:25 UTC 2015
MonadIO remains Haskell 98. This means that it has a chance of actually
getting into core libraries in a standardizable form and eventually making
it into the report.
The problem is there is no full description of MultiParamTypeClasses +
FunctionalDependencies that is compatible with all the implementations out
there to bless and readily standardize. GHC and Hugs (and older GHCs)
disagree on a number of corner cases of how this works.
Worse, the corner cases where they disagree come up because of how GHC
desugars things into type families, so describing current GHC behavior
really would require dragging into the report pretty much all of
OutsideIn(X), which is an order of magnitude more complicated than the
entire report today.
So, yes, if we ever want to be able to see the bulk of the combinators in
base lifted generalized and have that fact become enshrined in a standard
then there is a very real reason to favor MonadIO.
-Edward
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Matthias Hörmann <mhoermann at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Is there a particular reason to still push MonadIO even though
> MonadBase (from transformers-base) is a cleaner, more
> general approach that also fits much more nicely with more powerful
> abstractions like MonadBaseControl (from monad-control)?
>
> I know it uses MultiParamTypeClasses but is there another, more
> practical reason for not using MonadBase IO instead of MonadIO?
>
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:29 PM, Ryan Scott <ryan.gl.scott at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > It looks like GHC's internal MonadIO was replaced with the one from
> > transformers in 2013 [1], so this is already fixed.
> >
> > Also, +1 on the MonadIO to base suggestion, now that's there's some
> > momentum behind that idea.
> >
> > ----------
> > [1]
> http://git.haskell.org/ghc.git/blobdiff/b13d546f9c454e6d2a15c20a3e10ec47328e33db..71feb1025eed0c3cc849c85e2b00e16bc1a21790:/compiler/utils/MonadUtils.hs
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libraries mailing list
> > Libraries at haskell.org
> > http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20150729/c82bdb7f/attachment.html>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list