Generalizing replicateM?

[Bart Massey]

+1 for the Farkas-Dyck patch. Someone should check the performance of the
replacement filterM, though: those loops may have been there for a reason
that is still valid.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 9:51 AM Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 from me.
>
> -Edward
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fumiaki Kinoshita <fumiexcel at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I noticed that traceM is generalized to use Applicative. Then, how about
>> replicateM/replicateM_?
>>
>> I don't quite like confusing names, but is better than
>> needlessly restrictive.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20150707/f42b7818/attachment.html>