Generalizing replicateM?

[Edward Kmett]

+1 from me.

-Edward

On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fumiaki Kinoshita <fumiexcel at gmail.com>
wrote:

> I noticed that traceM is generalized to use Applicative. Then, how about
> replicateM/replicateM_?
>
> I don't quite like confusing names, but is better than
> needlessly restrictive.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20150707/b145b393/attachment.html>