[core libraries] Re: List of core libraries

[Brandon Allbery]

On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>> but to the extent that the community affects and is affected by these
>> lists, the libraries committee is empowered to act on behalf of the
>> community.
>>
>
> If there are other teams working on compilers that want to engage with the
> core libraries committee to get better interoperability, we'd be happy to
> engage, but thus far, GHC is the only party at the table actively talking
> to us.
>

Yes, de facto this only means GHC at present. But it also captures, or
intends to capture, your statement:

The main thing the core libraries committee does right now is deal with
> that uncomfortable buffer zone between what GHC HQ wants to deal with
> (making GHC fast and nice to use) and what the rest of the ecosystem wants
> to maintain (many of the individual maintainer packages in the platform).
>

-- 
brandon s allbery kf8nh                               sine nomine associates
allbery.b at gmail.com                                  ballbery at sinenomine.net
unix, openafs, kerberos, infrastructure, xmonad        http://sinenomine.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140929/96497241/attachment.html>