process: Confusion about UseHandle handles being closed.

[Henning Thielemann]

On Wed, 26 Nov 2014, Michael Snoyman wrote:

> So I'd argue that:
> 
> 1. If we want to have a discussion about radically changing the API, let's have that discussion, but include
> a very clear set of plans for migration. Henning: have you given that any thought?

As I have written, a first step into the right direction could be setter 
functions for CreateProcess. Another step could be to export 
createProcess_, but give a warning in the documentation, that it is only a 
temporary solution. Alternatively you could add CreateProcess_, an opaque 
equivalent of CreateProcess, according setter functions, and 
createProcess_ which accepts CreateProcess_ as input. Or you generalize 
createProcess using a type class, such that it both accepts CreateProcess 
and CreateProcess_ as input. However this might make CreateProcess_ a long 
term solution. Alternatively, you could add a new module that provides an 
opaque CreateProcess record with setter functions and an according 
createProcess function.