'temporary' package

[Roman Cheplyaka]

No. In my opinion, there's no good reason why a package should remain broken for
more than a day, given that there are people who has found, reported, and fixed
the issue. All the actual work is done, now someone just has to push a button.

* Oliver Charles <ollie at ocharles.org.uk> [2014-05-07 13:29:40+0100]
> Isn't a 4 day turn around on a pull request a little hasty?
> 
> - ocharles
> 
> 
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:50 AM, Roman Cheplyaka <roma at ro-che.info> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Max,
> >
> > are you still maintaining the 'temporary' package?
> > There's a breakage waiting to be fixed (with a patch):
> > https://github.com/batterseapower/temporary/pull/12
> >
> > If I don't hear from you in two days, I'll request maintainership and/or
> > fork the package.
> >
> > Roman
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libraries mailing list
> > Libraries at haskell.org
> > http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
> >
> >
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140507/bea5455b/attachment.sig>