Formal proposal: replace Data.List.inits

[David Feuer]

Ah, I am being a little silly. Tunnel vision. The fusion only matters if
you're skipping a bunch of lists. So ... I don't know why your results are
worse, really.
On Aug 19, 2014 7:04 PM, "David Feuer" <david.feuer at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Aug 19, 2014 6:42 PM, "Bertram Felgenhauer" <
> bertram.felgenhauer at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Interestingly, initsQ looks better than initsT in these benchmarks.
>
> I love the simplicity of initsT, but unlike initsQ (with Joachim
> Breitner's fusing scanl') it won't fuse properly with with a list producer.
> I don't know if that can be fixed or not. If so ... that would be great. In
> any case, it would be very interesting indeed to see how it performs in a
> library that uses stream fusion instead of fold/build—there's a library in
> the vector package for that, and it currently uses the broken version of
> inits; you might want to try initsT out with that one.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140819/5433fb6e/attachment.html>