Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

[Geoffrey Mainland]

I would be happy to share maintainership!

Geoff

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:53:41AM -0500, Edward Kmett wrote:
>    Fair enough. I had missed that fact! In that case, we could bring vector
>    under the arm of the core libraries committee, or we could seek a more
>    direct maintainer.A 
>    [Adding Geoffrey Mainland to the To: list]
>    Geoffrey, would you be willing to pick up maintainership?A 
>    I mention it mostly because I know your recent SIMD work has been very
>    vector-centric, and you are the person most likely to affect it's course
>    in the near term.
>    If not, I could pick it up personally, or we could put it under the core
>    libraries committee.
>    -EdwardA 
> 
>    On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com>
>    wrote:
> 
>      On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>        I'd like to hash this out a bit further. As this issue
>        affectsA vectorA primarily, it is outside of the scope of the core
>        library committee per se, and is largely up to Roman as the maintainer
>        ofA vector.
> 
>      Remember that Roman has fairly explicitly resigned as the maintainer of
>      vector for want of time, so someone else needs to take up the crusade
>      here.