Who needs and wants parallelism-friendly core libs?

[Edward Kmett]

Fair enough. I had missed that fact! In that case, we could bring vector
under the arm of the core libraries committee, or we could seek a more
direct maintainer.

[Adding Geoffrey Mainland to the To: list]

Geoffrey, would you be willing to pick up maintainership?

I mention it mostly because I know your recent SIMD work has been very
vector-centric, and you are the person most likely to affect it's course in
the near term.

If not, I could pick it up personally, or we could put it under the core
libraries committee.

-Edward


On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Bryan O'Sullivan <bos at serpentine.com>wrote:

>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:11 AM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'd like to hash this out a bit further. As this issue affects vector primarily,
>> it is outside of the scope of the core library committee per se, and is
>> largely up to Roman as the maintainer of vector.
>>
>
> Remember that Roman has fairly explicitly resigned as the maintainer of
> vector for want of time, so someone else needs to take up the crusade here.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20131121/b99cc9a0/attachment.html>