Proposal: Add (&) to Data.Function

[Jon Fairbairn]

Cale Gibbard <cgibbard at gmail.com> writes:

> On 22 November 2012 11:46, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> -1 for adding such an operator at all. Languages benefit from consistnet
>>> idiom; too many ways of doing the same thing are not always good.
>>
>>
>> -1 for me for the same reason. After looking at examples in this thread I
>> don't find that the loss in readability is worth it.
>>
>> Also for beginners I don't want to explain yet another way to write function
>> application.
>>
>
> -1 for more or less the same reason.

And -1 from me for the same reason. The more ways there are of
writing the same thing, the more effort it takes to read them.

-- 
Jón Fairbairn                                 Jon.Fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk