Proposal: Add (&) to Data.Function

[dag.odenhall at gmail.com]

+1 for &; I think it reads really well, and I think it's silly to go for
consistency with C (especially when we can't have | anyway). I know some
beginners struggle with function application ordering in Haskell because
they find it unnatural and you have to backtrack more when reading such
code. I'm sure those people would like (&).

 -1 for |>; there are reasons I rarely use >>> for flip (.), and I wouldn't
use |> either.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20121122/09fc0d59/attachment.htm>