Proposal: Add (&) to Data.Function

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

-1 for adding such an operator at all. Languages benefit from consistnet
idiom; too many ways of doing the same thing are not always good.

If such an operator is added, then -1 for & (I don’t see any useful hint
for that) and +1 for |> (looks self-explanatory, prior art).

Greetings,
Joachim


-- 
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de  |  nomeata at debian.org  |  GPG: 0x4743206C
  xmpp: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20121122/899514e7/attachment.pgp>