Gábor Lehel illissius at gmail.com
Tue Nov 20 22:08:12 CET 2012

```Another option that was raised in a mailing list thread at some point
(I think it was one about records): \$.

The idea being to evoke the dot operator of object-oriented languages
together with the existing (\$) of function application.

theList \$. filter even \$. map (*2) \$. sum

If you read it by focusing on the dots as in an OO language it sort of
works. Not sure how I feel about it, throwing it out there. As a
candidate for the least bad choice I think it at least qualifies.

On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Yitzchak Gale <gale at sefer.org> wrote:
>  It is a common idiom to write a sequence of composed combinators in
>  reverse order to the way they would be written with (\$) or (.). That
>  naturally expresses the idea of the combinators as operations being
>  applied in the given order.
>
>  This comes up so often, and is commonly used so many times in a single
>  expression, that Control.Arrow.>>> is far too wordy, and even a two-
>  character operator is awkward.
>
>  Surprisingly, until recently the operator (&) was still not used in any
>  of the popular libraries, and its name naturally expresses the idea we are
>  looking for. This operator has now been defined in the lens package. We
>  hereby propose to move it to its natural home for more general use,
>  Data.Function.
>
>  As in the lens package, we define the operator as a flipped version of
>  (\$), but with slightly higher precedence for better interaction with
>  (\$), and with left associativity. This definition has already proven
>  useful and convenient even in the presence of the large  and varied corpus
>  of combinators and operators in the lens package. (There it was formerly
>  known as (%), but that clashed with the usual meaning of (%) from
>  Data.Ratio.)
>
>  infixl 1 &
>  (&) :: a -> (a -> b) -> b
>  a & f = f a
>  {-# INLINE (&) #-}
>
> Discussion period: 2 weeks
>
>
> Thanks,
> Yitz
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list