Faster IntSet by using BitMaps in the lower branches
Joachim Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Mon Sep 19 17:09:31 CEST 2011
Hi,
Am Montag, den 19.09.2011, 16:03 +0200 schrieb Gregory Collins:
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There are some neat tricks you can use using deBruijn multiplication to
> > optimize finding the least significant set bit.
> > My geometric coalgebra code
> > in https://github.com/ekmett/algebra/blob/master/Numeric/Coalgebra/Geometric.hs#L72
> > uses the following:
>
> I use this in hashtables also :)
>
> https://github.com/gregorycollins/hashtables/blob/master/src/Data/HashTable/Internal/CacheLine.hs#L273
hmm...
-- only works with 32-bit values -- ok for us here
firstBitSet# :: Int# -> Int#
That’s why I feel uneasy about this method. But now we have already
three users of a firstBitSet function, all of which had to re-implement
the wheel. This is really a strong argument for putting this as a method
into Data.Bits and the code into GHC.Word, where machine-specific
instructions can be used if found to be faster.
Greetings,
Joachim
--
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de | nomeata at debian.org | GPG: 0x4743206C
xmpp: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20110919/1a6b89dc/attachment.pgp>
More information about the Libraries
mailing list