Proposal: Use time rather than old-time in directory
ekmett at gmail.com
Mon Oct 24 12:10:51 CEST 2011
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 24, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Jon Fairbairn <jon.fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li> writes:
>> This proposal is to change directory to use the time package rather than
>> the old-time package. This will hopefully be a significant step towards
>> actually making the transition in general.
> The present state of affairs annoys me every time I want to deal
> with file modification times.
>> I'm not sure if POSIXTime or UTCTime is the better type to use. Does
>> anyone know?
> I think the library definition ought not to rely on
> platform-specific time representations¹. Apropos the question of
> avoiding information loss, can the library have implementation
> specific work-arounds? Something like on POSIX systems, have
> UTCTime have an extra (secret) field that provides sufficient
> information to turn it back to the system representation.
>  and I’m saying this from the point of view of someone who
> uses unix-type systems almost exclusively.
> Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk
> http://www.chaos.org.uk/~jf/Stuff-I-dont-want.html (updated 2010-09-14)
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
More information about the Libraries