[PATCH] Split Data.IntMap into Data.IntMap.Strict and Data.IntMap.Lazy.

[Gregory Collins]

+1 for both .Strict and .Lazy.

G

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Edward Kmett <ekmett at gmail.com> wrote:
> We had both me and you weigh in on having both .Strict and .Lazy for
> consistency with the other libraries, and Milan weigh in on the other side.
> Going by a sheer vote count, then I think it'd be settled.
> Milan?
> -Edward
> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Milan Straka <fox at ucw.cz> wrote:
>>>
>>> We got opinions only from the proponent and both maintainers.
>>> I interpret the silence as the community being happy with the change.
>>
>> Me too. Did we settle the issue of having both .Strict and .Lazy. I think
>> we should.
>> -- Johan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>



-- 
Gregory Collins <greg at gregorycollins.net>