[PATCH] Split Data.IntMap into Data.IntMap.Strict and Data.IntMap.Lazy.

[Edward Kmett]

We had both me and you weigh in on having both .Strict and .Lazy for
consistency with the other libraries, and Milan weigh in on the other side.

Going by a sheer vote count, then I think it'd be settled.

Milan?

-Edward

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Milan Straka <fox at ucw.cz> wrote:
>
>> We got opinions only from the proponent and both maintainers.
>> I interpret the silence as the community being happy with the change.
>
>
> Me too. Did we settle the issue of having both .Strict and .Lazy. I think
> we should.
>
> -- Johan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20111002/129b71bd/attachment.htm>