[PATCH] Split Data.IntMap into Data.IntMap.Strict and Data.IntMap.Lazy.

Edward Kmett ekmett at gmail.com
Sun Oct 2 23:50:18 CEST 2011


We had both me and you weigh in on having both .Strict and .Lazy for
consistency with the other libraries, and Milan weigh in on the other side.

Going by a sheer vote count, then I think it'd be settled.

Milan?

-Edward

On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 5:37 PM, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Milan Straka <fox at ucw.cz> wrote:
>
>> We got opinions only from the proponent and both maintainers.
>> I interpret the silence as the community being happy with the change.
>
>
> Me too. Did we settle the issue of having both .Strict and .Lazy. I think
> we should.
>
> -- Johan
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20111002/129b71bd/attachment.htm>


More information about the Libraries mailing list