Proposal: Applicative => Monad: Call for consensus

[Antoine Latter]

Okay, I still can't read. Now I was confusing this with the GHC only patch.

I'll back away slowly, now.

On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:49 AM, Antoine Latter <aslatter at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah! Yup, I just noticed.
>
> I can't read, apparently :-)
>
> Yeah, I get irritated whenever I come across a Monad instance and I
> cannot use the Applicative combinators. So I guess I'm in favor.
>
> Is there a reason this is appropriate for the libraries process? Do
> any of these changes spill out into the public interface of base or
> GHC.Ext?
>
> Sorry for the confusion,
> Antoine
>
> On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:46 AM, John Smith <voldermort at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On 02/01/2011 14:04, John Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Please note that although the ticket references the wiki page at
>>> http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/Functor-Applicative-Monad_Proposal, the
>>> patches attached to the ticket are much more
>>> conservative than the more ambitious reforms on the wiki. (I would like to
>>> change the ticket description to make this
>>> clearer, but I can't edit it.)
>>
>> To clarify - this proposal is to implement just the patches attached to the
>> ticket, /not/ everything in the related wiki page.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Libraries mailing list
>> Libraries at haskell.org
>> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>>
>