Viability of having a new top-level "Graph" module namespace

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello Ivan,

Thursday, August 5, 2010, 10:49:49 AM, you wrote:

> * Not all graph-related modules are necessarily strictly about
> data-types, etc. (and I can't find any distinction about what defines
> the Data.* namespace anyway); e.g. my graphviz library currently uses
> Data.GraphViz.*, though it should arguably go under Graphics.* instead
> (it's currently under Data.* because that's how I found it when I took
> over maintainership).

i think that it will be better to use Data.Graph.* for data structures
and Graphics.* for GUI functions 


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com