Haskell Platform package additions: decision time!

Bryan O'Sullivan bos at serpentine.com
Fri Sep 18 16:29:39 EDT 2009

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:54 PM, Duncan Coutts
<duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk>wrote:

> So far we have had a few people send in comments (thanks particularly to
> Ian and Simon) but a few more would not go amiss, even if it's just
> "yes".

"Yes" :-)

Thanks for reworking the pages to be shorter. That was part of what kept me
from reading them.

Concern 3. The more major and general complaint Ian has is that he
> believes the criteria for acceptance should be essentially a checklist.
> Some checklist items would be objective, some subjective, but passing
> them all would be sufficient for a package to be accepted.

A checklist divided into "MUST"/"SHOULD" sections is very valuable,
independent of other considerations. That's what we use for Fedora package
reviews, and it very much helps us to ensure that we don't skip anything.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20090918/ee34017c/attachment.html

More information about the Libraries mailing list