MTL vs Transformers. Any status update?

[Gregory Collins]

Duncan Coutts <duncan.coutts at googlemail.com> writes:

> Right, so having transformers + mtl is bad, but why do we want to end
> up with a situation where we have both? If you've all agreed what
> should go into the new monad package, can't we call that mtl-2 ? Why
> would we want to define things in one package and re-export them in
> another?

+1.

G
-- 
Gregory Collins <greg at gregorycollins.net>